Overseas Citizen Population Analysis Report
FVAP conducts the multipart Overseas Citizen Population Analysis (OCPA) biennially in conjunction with each federal election cycle and in response to its federal requirement for conducting a statistical analysis on overseas citizen participation rates. The study assesses overseas voting participation, monitors how voters are navigating the absentee voting process from abroad, and informs efforts to remove obstacles.
The most recent OCPA report details U.S. citizens abroad and their voting behaviors in 2016. It combines data from U.S. and foreign governments, state records of ballot requests and voting, and a survey of 10,965 registered voters living abroad who requested a ballot for the 2016 General Election - the only representative survey of this group.
The report provides updated estimates of the numbers of U.S. citizens living in foreign countries and the voting rate of the overseas citizen voting-age population in the 2016 General Election. It also compares the rate to that of the voting-age population living in the United States; determines how much of the difference in participation is due to obstacles unique to the overseas voting process; and assesses how FVAP can help mitigate these obstacles.
The OCPA report on overseas citizens and their voting behaviors in 2016 includes:
The 2014 OCPA report can be found here.
Frequently Asked Questions
(1) What were the primary objectives of the Overseas Citizen Population Analysis (OCPA) project?
The Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP) first conducted the OCPA in 2014 with a twofold goal: (a) gain a greater understanding of the voting behavior of U.S. citizens living overseas during the 2014 General Election, and (b) fulfill a requirement for reporting registration and participation rates among overseas citizens pursuant to the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA).
The 2016 OCPA is the second iteration of this study, and has a similar goal of understanding and reporting on the status of overseas voting registration and participation. This research effort involved creating estimates of the number of U.S. citizens in each foreign country and conducting a survey of registered overseas voters. Results allow FVAP to track overseas voter participation rates over time and to determine what types of challenges and obstacles overseas citizens face when they seek to cast a ballot.
Going forward, FVAP plans to conduct OCPA biennially, following each U.S. general election.
(2) Has anyone ever calculated the voting rate of overseas U.S. citizens before?
There have been attempts to calculate an overall voting rate for overseas citizens; however, the 2014 OCPA was the first project that assembled the data necessary to estimate the overseas voting-age population, which is a critical requirement for calculating voting rates. Throughout this effort in 2016, FVAP and its researchers completed several subgoals, including:
- Estimating an aggregate voting rate of the overseas civilian population in the 2016 General Election. To calculate this, we divided the number of 2016 General Election ballots that were recorded by local election officials by our estimate of the total number of voting-eligible overseas citizens.
- Estimating the voting rate of the subset of voting-eligible overseas citizens who actively requested a ballot. To do this, we divided the number of 2016 General Election ballots that were requested by overseas citizens by the number of 2016 General Election ballots that were received from overseas citizens and recorded by local election officials.
- Estimating what the voting rate among overseas citizens would have been absent overseas-specific obstacles to voting, and thus the impact of those obstacles on the participation by UOCAVA citizens in the 2016 General Election.
(3) Has anyone else ever produced estimates of the number of U.S. citizens living overseas?
The United Nations and World Bank have produced estimates of the number of U.S.-born or U.S. citizens living overseas by country. FVAP produced estimates of the number of overseas U.S. citizens in 2013, but these estimates included all overseas U.S. citizens, not just those who were old enough to vote (i.e., those aged 18 or older). In 2004, the U.S. Census Bureau piloted a program to assess the feasibility of including overseas citizens in its decennial census, but the study found that full implementation would be prohibitively expensive and would not produce a level of data quality consistent with Census standards.[i] In previous years, the Department of State has released estimates of the number of overseas civilians; in 2011, this estimate was 6.3 million.[ii]
(4) Why does the OCPA rely on estimates of overseas citizens? Doesn't the U.S. Department of State know how many Americans are abroad?
The United States does not issue exit visas or monitor its citizens when they travel outside of the country. Individuals who travel or live abroad can register with their local embassy to receive alerts from the Department of State, but no official registry is kept. Registries that do exist include citizens on short-term travel as well as long-term relocation, and there is no process to remove duplicates if individuals register at more than one embassy or to remove people from the list who have returned to the United States. As noted in Question 3, the Department of State has not released these estimates publicly since 2011.
(5) How are FVAP's OCPA estimates of overseas citizens different from estimates created by other groups?
Previous population estimates created by other groups: (a) excluded key countries; (b) were produced for years before 2016; or (c) used different definitions of U.S. citizens or methods of counting them.
To estimate voting rates, a census of U.S. citizens is preferred, as only citizens can vote and a census is thought to be more reliable than administrative records that may be incomplete or duplicative. The OCPA research team compiled data from many different sources to create statistical estimates of what a government census of the number of U.S. citizens (including dual citizens) in each of 170 countries would be. These sources include registries and censuses kept by foreign governments, administrative records from U.S. agencies (e.g., foreign income tax filers, social security beneficiaries, civilian government employees, students), and a set of country characteristics that may affect immigration to or from that country, such as the distance from the United States, the quality of governance/institutions, and the primary language of the country. A similar modeling approach was used to estimate the fraction of the total U.S. citizen population that was eligible to vote (i.e., aged 18 or older). Summing the voting-eligible population across countries provided an estimate of the total size of the Overseas Citizen Voting-Age Population (OCVAP).
(6) Why does the OCPA estimate for a given country differ from that provided by the country's government?
Governments vary with respect to how they define their "American" population as well as how they count it. Some governments count individuals born in the United States whereas others count those with U.S. citizenship. Even among those governments providing counts of citizens, it is unclear whether dual citizens (those who are both citizens of the United States and the host country) are included. Counting methods also vary, with some governments using a census and others using administrative records. As noted in Question 5, the OCPA uses a statistical model to estimate, for each country, the number of U.S. citizens that would be counted in a population census.
These measurement differences, as well as idiosyncratic features of the country or its estimate not captured by our model, can result in an OCPA estimate for a given country that differs substantially from the estimate provided by the country's government.
(7) Has anyone ever conducted a survey of overseas U.S. citizens?
The lack of a comprehensive list of overseas citizens makes it difficult to conduct such surveys. The Overseas Citizen Population Survey (OCPS), a component of the larger OCPA project, is a survey of overseas voters who requested an absentee ballot. It builds on past surveys conducted by FVAP and other organizations by using a more rigorous and inclusive sampling method. Specifically, in 2004, the Census Bureau conducted a pilot survey of overseas citizens in three countries, relying on third-party organizations and paid advertising to distribute questionnaires and to draw attention to the study. FVAP also conducted a survey of overseas citizens in 2004, which was distributed through embassies in various locations.[iii] More recent efforts include the work of private organizations like the Overseas Vote Foundation (OVF), which conducts a voting survey of its website users, many of whom are current overseas voters. Although all of these studies provided valuable information, none met the "gold standard" criterion: selecting respondents from a list of people in a way that each has an equal chance, or probability, of being surveyed. The 2014 OCPS marked FVAP's first effort to survey overseas U.S. citizens in this manner.
The primary difference between the OCPS and other surveys is the ability to generalize survey results to the broader population of overseas voters. This is possible because the survey draws from a comprehensive list of overseas voters who requested an absentee ballot. The 2014 and 2016 OCPS sample frames were developed by obtaining data from absentee ballot request files maintained by state and local election officials. A stratified sample of ballot requesters was then selected and invited to participate in the survey. Finally, the data were weighted to accurately reflect the absentee ballot-requesting population as a whole and not just the survey respondents.
(8) How do you know how many people voted from each country? Aren't voting records private?
Estimates of the total number of votes that were counted from overseas civilians can be obtained from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission's (EAC) Election Administration and Voting Survey (EAVS), which is a survey of state and local election officials. However, this survey only reports the aggregate count of overseas ballots within a jurisdiction, not the country from which votes were submitted. Consequently, FVAP produced its own count of registered overseas voters by obtaining data from absentee ballot request files maintained by state and local election officials. Knowing how many voters were in each country allowed us to calculate country-specific voting rates.
(9) Is the fraction of the overseas population that is of voting age really that small?
Estimates of the total overseas citizen population and the eligible overseas population are produced using sophisticated technical models, but ultimately, there will always be a level of uncertainty about the true number of overseas citizens. However, there are several reasons that the overseas citizen population might tend to be younger than the domestic population, including the various rules that govern who is considered a U.S. citizen and well-documented patterns of migration to and from the United States.
The OCPS collected data on the citizenship and family status of overseas citizens who requested an absentee ballot from an address outside of the United States. Among respondents who reported being married and having a child who was a U.S. citizen, approximately half (52.2%) indicated that their spouse does not have U.S. citizenship. Although this sample of overseas ballot requesters is not necessarily representative of the general overseas population, there is little reason to think this proportion represents an overestimate relative to the general overseas population.
There is quite a bit of geographic variation in the proportion of overseas citizens who are aged 18 or older in 2016. For instance, 75% of U.S. citizens residing in Canada and 85% of those residing in Germany are estimated to be 18 or older, whereas only 18% of U.S. citizens residing in Mexico and 26% of those residing in India are estimated to be 18 or older. To some extent, this mirrors overall population trends in these countries, where relatively high birth rates in Mexico and India mean that the overall population tends to be younger in those countries. These statistics are also influenced by the return migration of children who are U.S. citizens born to parents who are not. In the case of Mexico, high levels of return migration have been documented.[iv]
(10) That sounds like a very low voting rate. Are the obstacles to voting outside the United States really that large?
This estimate is low compared to the voting rates estimated for other populations, including active duty military (ADM). Myriad factors might lead to this lower rate of participation among this overseas citizen population: obstacles in the voting process, lack of engagement, disinterest in U.S. elections, etc.[v]
As a first attempt to understand the gap between the domestic and overseas participation rates, in the 2016 OCPA report, we (a) estimate the effect of obstacles to voting on participation by comparing vote rates for high- and low-obstacle countries; (b) using these estimated effects, determine what the overseas civilian voting rate would have been absent overseas-specific obstacles to voting; and (c) take the difference between this obstacle-free vote rate and the estimated actual vote to obtain an estimate of how much of the overseas civilian participation gap is due to these obstacles. We estimate that slightly less than half of the participation gap is due to overseas-specific obstacles to voting.
(11) Why aren't military Service members included? How did you make sure they were excluded? Where can I find info about (overseas) military voting?
FVAP's mission is to provide voting assistance to military Service members, their families, and overseas citizens. This particular study focused on the last group as FVAP conducts other studies on military registration and participation rates. To control for any overlap, absentee ballot requesters that a state or local election official flagged as "Military" or whose address was on a military base were not invited to participate in the OCPS. In addition, the 2016 OCPS asks a question regarding why the respondent was living overseas, and respondents who answered that they were in the Military or were the spouse of a military Service member were excluded from the analysis. More information about military voting can be found at FVAP.gov.
(12) What is the difference between an overseas citizen and an overseas voter? Can all overseas citizens also be considered overseas voters?
An overseas citizen is defined as a citizen of the United States who is living or located in another country and who is not an ADM member or dependent. If an overseas citizen is at least 18 years old, he or she is defined as part of the Overseas Citizen Voting-Age Population (OCVAP), which constitutes the voting-eligible population for the purposes of this study.
A registered overseas voter is defined as a member of the OCVAP who has specifically registered to vote and has requested an absentee ballot to be sent to an overseas address. All registered overseas voters are overseas citizens, but not all overseas citizens are registered overseas voters. The population represented in OCPS is the subset of overseas citizens who are registered overseas voters.
(13) Who did overseas voters vote for? Are they more likely to be Republicans or Democrats?
FVAP is a nonpartisan agency and does not collect any information about voters' party preferences or votes cast. Voter files are a matter of public record, which means anyone can see who is registered to vote and which elections they voted in, but all U.S. ballots are secret ballots. Out of respect for the privacy of overseas voters, FVAP does not ask them any questions about which candidates or party they voted for, even when data collection is confidential and anonymous. FVAP's goal is to ensure that all military and overseas voters can complete the voting process if they desire to do so, regardless of their party affiliation, candidate preferences, or political views.
(14) Why do the estimated numbers of total and voting-age U.S. citizens living abroad for the years 2000 - 2014 differ between the 2014 and 2016 OCPA?
Since the 2014 OCPA analysis was conducted, additional data have become available. Specifically, additional estimates of the number of Americans living in particular countries were added to the 2016 population estimation models. In addition, a new data source (IPUMS International) was used to obtain estimates of the demographic composition of Americans living abroad, and thus what fraction of that population is of voting age. Because the data changed, the models changed, and thus the final estimates for the 2000 - 2014 period differ slightly from those reported in the 2014 OCPA. It is important to note that although the exact numbers differ, the general population patterns remain largely the same as those reported previously. Going forward, as new data become available for future iterations of the OCPA, and as methodologies used to clean and impute that data become more refined, estimates for a given year will change.
[i] Government Accountability Office. (2004). 2010 Census: Counting Americans overseas as part of the Census would not be feasible. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office. Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d041077t.pdf
[iii] Federal Voting Assistance Program. (2005). The Federal Voting Assistance Program: Seventeenth report. Washington, DC: Department of Defense. Retrieved from https://www.fvap.gov/uploads/FVAP/Reports/17threport.pdf
[iv] González-Barrera, A. (2015). More Mexicans leaving than coming to the US. Pew Research Center, 19. Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2015/11/19/more-mexicans-leaving-than-coming-to-the-u-s/
[v] Greater detail on the relative importance of these factors can be found on page 27 of Volume 1 of the full report.